ComicsChildrenHumorFitnessReferenceITLawCookingHobbiesTeachingSelf-HelpPhotoFantasyHistoryTestsCalendarsFictionLGBTTeenagersTransportMemorisMedicineMysteryRelationshipsPoliticsBusinessSpiritualityRomanceBiblesMathSportTravelOtherNo category
» » Plausible Denial
Plausible Denial e-book

Author:

Mark Lane

Language:

English

Category:

Politics

Subcategory:

Politics & Government

ePub size:

1812 kb

Other formats:

doc azw mbr lit

Rating:

4.9

Publisher:

Random House Audio (July 1, 1992)

ISBN:

0553470884

Plausible Denial e-book

by Mark Lane


Mark Lane has published 2 books (including this book) with the names of Kennedy's assassins.

Mark Lane has published 2 books (including this book) with the names of Kennedy's assassins. It's shocking that there is not more interest in investigating and prosecuting JFK's assassins based on the evidence in this book. Just as Lane believes it is a cardinal sin to bore a jury, he keeps the reader's attention riveted to the pages of his books. It matters not that this book was first published over 20 years ago.

Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? is a 1991 book by American attorney, Mark Lane that outlines his theory that former Watergate figure E. Howard Hunt was involved with the Central Intelligence Agency in the assassina. Howard Hunt was involved with the Central Intelligence Agency in the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy.

Plausible Denial book.

Witness Supports Mark Lane's Plausible Denial. Lane's analysis of the assassination in his first book, and later in PLAUSIBLE DENIAL, demonstrated his unique mind as an attorney, that of someone who would eventually become one of our nation's history's greatest advocates. Published by Thriftbooks. Lane's world famous book, Rush To Judgment, became the number one best seller in America and the world in the first year of its publication. Though his book was clearly a classic cornerstone of history, the . publishers initially turned it down.

In Plausible Denial, Mark Lane, the author of Rush to Judgment, the provocative and bestselling critique of the Warren Commission, reveals startling evidence about the CIA’s involvement in a plot to murder the president. Lane signed on as defense counsel for the publication, and set out to prove the truth of the allegations against Hunt and the CIA.

Books for People with Print Disabilities. Internet Archive Books. Delaware County District Library (Ohio).

In this bestseller, Plausible Denial reveals starting new information about the Central Intelligence Agency's role in the assassination of President John F. Mark Lane, author of Rush to Judgment, previously revealed the cover-up by the government in his critique of the Warren Commission Report. Now he reveals documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and startling revelations obtained during his examination of former CIA operatives and officials during Lane's legal defense of a newspaper in a defamation case.

A provocative expose of the Warren Commission's findings on the assassination of Kennedy examines a 1985 libel case that convinced a Florida jury that the CIA had been involved in his killing.
Nidor
This is a classic among JFK assassination writing. Mark Lane was the New York defense attorney who wrote "Rush to Judgment," calling into question the Warren Commission's approach and conclusions. "Rush to Judgment" reads like a lawyer's brief. Likewise, "Plausible Denial" is essentially the detailed account of a trial that he litigated in the 1980s, and while it is only a civil action for defamation, the book is absolutely mesmerizing. It's a fantastic read from cover to cover.

Mark Lane acts as the defense counsel for "Liberty Lobby, Inc.," a right-wing conspiracy-theory interest group that was frequently sued for publishing outlandish stories. Its publication, "Spotlight," published an article written by a former CIA officer alleging that another CIA officer, E. Howard Hunt, was in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. Hunt sued Liberty Lobby and won a $650,000 judgment in the trial court, but on appeal, the case was remanded to the trial court and retried due to erroneous jury instructions the first time. Lane takes on the defense in the retrial, and famously wins.

But Lane does more than simply overturn the prior court ruling. He actually makes the second trial into an investigation of whether Hunt was a conspirator in the assassination of JFK, and this is where the book's merit really lies. Lane has little sympathy for his own client, but he does know a lot about E. Howard Hunt, his background, and the various spies and lawyers Hunt calls as witnesses in depositions and at trial. In astoundingly expert fashion, demonstrative of a crystal clear mind, Lane lays it all out in this amazing book. Read it.
Kinashand
Mark Lane has published 2 books (including this book) with the names of Kennedy's assassins. It's shocking that there is not more interest in investigating and prosecuting JFK's assassins based on the evidence in this book. Mark Lane has published another book with a libelous title (My Indictment of the CIA in the Murder of JFK) that more or less challenges the CIA to go to court, and it appears that the CIA has decided to ignore the challenge in the hope that the information in these books won't be widely disseminated. US citizens live in a pseudo-democracy at best, and maybe the Matrix at worst, where reality TV shows are a substitute for reality.
Cktiell
Lane was smart. Very smart. He was also in my opinion an American hero. But beyond any fascination this book may hold for a reader interested in learning of facts suppressed by the power structure concerning the assassination (not inconsiderable!), the other surprise about the book is the insight Lane gives into how a trial lawyer formulates strategy. When reading just remember that he's not a prose stylist but a very clear-minded fellow who gets where he's going in the same way Arthur Murray taught you to dance. Plus he can be quite amusing.
Mustard Forgotten
This is the second volume of holy writ in the Bible of JFK assassination research.

If you have not read this book "Plausible Denial" and the first volume of JFK assassination research scripture "Rush to Judgement" you will forever have an incomplete understanding of what truths are known about the assassination of JFK.

Conversely, if you read these two seminal works by Mark Lane you will gain a sufficient understanding of the confirmed, corroborated and irrefutable facts of the case to be forever disabused of the mainstream establishment myth.

Mark Lane's books clear the cerebral palate and allow the reader to freely exploit common sense and reason to begin to imagine what might actually have happened on November 22, 1963.

Recently published worthwhile JFK assassination research books by Stone, Nelson and Fiester are immeasurably better digested after having first consumed "Plausible Denial" and "Rush to Judgment".

Nothing compares to these two works by Mark Lane in identifying the fundamental argument for exculpating Oswald and indicting the direct or indirect involvement of the CIA and several other actors in the large scale conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

Mark Lane ranks with John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and Alexander Hamilton in his contribution to the cause of liberty and reminding the Republic to stand vigilant in checking the government to safeguard the rights of individual citizens.

The 4 and 5 star reviews that precede this review are deficient and incompetent. Plausible Denial and Rush to Judgment deserve summary 10-star ratings.

Just as Lane believes it is a cardinal sin to bore a jury, he keeps the reader's attention riveted to the pages of his books.

It matters not that this book was first published over 20 years ago. Like Rush to Judgment published nearly 50 years ago Plausible Denial is a gripping edge-of-your-seat account of stranger-than-fiction facts implicating extra-constitutional "intelligence" agencies and nefarious partners-in-crime in murdering the president of the United States for "national security" reasons.
Axebourne
Written with much detail, a lot of deposition questions, and Trial Q and A. Might be dry to some people, I enjoyed it.

Alot of disturbing info on E Howard Hunt (along with G Gordon Liddy) such as how they set up an attack on Ed Muske's wife at the 1972 convention, which may have led to Muske dropping out. And plans to sabotage the Air conditioning at the Democratic convention in Miami. Hiring attractive Prostitutes to get information on Candidates, I.E. Richard Nixons Dirty Tricks Dept.

Some of the testimony was quite shocking, as some of the usual suspects were tied together, being placed at the same place at the same time. in the end, E Howard Hunt got caught in his own lies, and lost his lawsuit, but all the JFK conspiracy information that came out was mesmerizing.
Vijora
This book was very interesting, convincing, and thought provoking. It did read like it was written by a lawyer, and was slow going at times. Not really a leisurely read.

e-Books related to Plausible Denial